Today's marriage-centered movement, they argue, channels relationships into traditional forms and marginalizes those who fail to fit the marital mold. Critics of today's marriage equality advocacy point to this history as a lost alternative past worthy of reclamation. Those opposing the turn to marriage urged the movement to continue pursuing nonmarital rights and recognition, including domestic partnership, as a way to decenter marriage for everyone. This debate went beyond mere strategic disagreement and instead focused on ideological differences regarding the role of marriage and its relationship to LGBT rights, family diversity, and sexual freedom. In fact, before the movement began to make explicit claims to marriage in the 1990s, leading advocates engaged in a vigorous debate about whether to seek marriage. But the relationship between LGBT advocacy and marriage was not always so clear. Windsor, it seems obvious that the LGBT movement is intent on securing marriage. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. In the wake of the celebration of the U.S.